MBIA: CEO Shuffle; Ambac: Trying to Raise $2 Billion

UPDATE: Added to link to Tom Brown's rebuttal of the bears...

MBIA Replaces CEO

I never really understand the goings and comings of MBIA. The latest event is the CEO shuffle:


Bond insurer MBIA Inc said Tuesday that former Chairman and CEO Joseph Brown was returning to replace current CEO Gary Dunton as the company, beset by mortgage-related losses, scrambles to maintain a top credit rating...

Between 1999 and 2004, Brown ran MBIA and its main unit, MBIA Insurance Corp. He joined the firm as a director in 1986 and retired last May.


Well, it's hard to say what is positive news and what is negative these days. I am guessing that this is good news given that the CEO ran the company before and was with the company as recently as early last year. I am guessing that Warburg Pincus and other key shareholders likely pushed for the change (there was little else that happened to warrant a shuffle).


Ambac Trying to Raise Capital

Ambac is trying to raise around $2 billion via a rights offering. It's premature to say anything concrete until we get the details on the cost and the amount. A lot depends on how much capital is required by the rating agencies. No word on what the agencies are requesting.


It also looks like both Ambac and MBIA are trying to split their muni bond business from the structured product business. I personally am not favourable to this idea. It involves too many complexities, increases legal liabilities, and can result in shareholders being pushed aside. I think the government needs to provide cover and absorb any lawsuits for any of this to make sense.


Tom Brown has a good write-up of the situation. He is bullish so we both share the same wavelength on many thoughts...

Comments

  1. cakFebruary 20, 2008 at 10:20 AM

    Ackman

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sivaram VFebruary 20, 2008 at 10:58 AM

    It's amazing how much air time Ackman gets. I can't think of a short seller who has ever been considered as an "expert" providing solutions to an industry. Usually short-sellers are shown the door by the media but not in this case.

    Well, needless to say, things are getting closer to the end game. Either Ackman is really confident with his bet, or he is running scared now. His proposal--which is nothing new--is to bankrupt the holding companies. It's surprising to see some people call Ackman's latest proposal as something radically different and new from his earlier proposals. If the companies split and are provided legal cover by the state, Ackman will likely lose his bet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. cakFebruary 20, 2008 at 11:27 AM

    When you talk about legal cover, do you mean free from liability on the SF side? Sounds like this could be a major contract law case..?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sivaram VFebruary 20, 2008 at 11:54 AM

    Yep... I'm talking about the possibility of structured product insurance buyers suing the monolines. That is a HUGE liability.

    Without knowing anything about legal matters, I suspect one solution may be to split the company while leaving most of teh claims-paying ability with the structured product side. This may satisfy the SF insurance buyers since they don't really lose much...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sivaram VFebruary 20, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    At least the state regulator is shooting down Ackman's idea before it gains much traction outside the media...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Charlie Munger: Stock market as a pari-mutuel betting system

The model I like to sort of simplify the notion of what goes o­n in a market for common stocks is the pari-mutuel system at the racetrack. If you stop to think about it, a pari-mutuel system is a market . Everybody goes there and bets and the odds change based o­n what's bet. That's what happens in the stock market. —Charlie Munger, "Art of Stock Picking" Although I don't share the same views on politics, I am probably closer to Charlie Munger than Warren Buffett when it comes to how we view the world. Warren Buffett is almost singly focused on business and investing, and is not very opinionated, indeed possibly not knowledgeable, in other areas. In contrast, I am closer to Charlie Munger in the sense that I have diverse interests—you can probably tell by the articles I link to or write about—and have an opinion on almost anything. There is one big difference though: I am not into the field of psychology quite like Munger. So it may be surprising to see me rarely
✖ READ MORE >>>