US Treasury bond debate - Jim Grant vs David Rosenberg

During Grant's 2010 Spring Conference, Jim Grant of Grant's Interest Rate Observer debated David Rosenberg of Gluskin Sheff + Associates  on the merits of buying US Treasury bonds. Grant is very bearish on the bond while Rosenberg took a bullish stance. For the video of the debate, click on the top video from this link.

Overall, anyone versed in the bull vs bear cases for US Treasuries wouldn't learn much from the debate. But if you want a refresh of the two sides, it is worth checking out.


I think one of the key points in favour of bond bulls—mentioned here by David Rosenberg but I have quoted Hugh Hendry and others saying the same thing—is that the American public is largely underweight long-term government bonds (pension funds, endowments, and others are also underweight bonds.) So, bears like Jim Grant may be correct in saying that bonds move in hard-to-decipher long cycles and it may have turned; but that is the case with stocks too. Stocks have been in favour for around 30 years now (note that I'm not talking about whether stock returns have been good or not; rather, I'm talking about the percentage of the portfolio that is allocated to stocks.)

I don't have much confidence in my stance but I am still leaning towards the bullish side for long bonds. The price chart over the last three years for the 30 year, 10 year, and 5 year bonds looks like the following:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>