Canada's largest IPO in a decade: Athabasca Oil Sands

From MarketWatch:


Athabasca Oil Sands Corp. makes its stock debut on Thursday in Canada after the producer of petroleum from Alberta raised nearly $1.4 billion as the richest Canadian IPO since 1999.


Not only is the Canadian dollar at parity with the U.S. greenback for the first time since 2008, but the Great White North appears ready to float the biggest stock offering so far this year in North America.

Athabasca Oil Sands will trade under the stock symbol ATH on the Toronto stock market. Its shares won't trade on any U.S. exchange.

On March 30, Athabasca said it sold 75 million shares, or a 19% at C$18 each, raising C$1.35 billion. With about 400 million shares outstanding after the IPO, Athabasca Oil Sands will carry a market cap of C$7.2 billion.

The IPO ranks as the richest from Canada since Manulife Financial Corp. raised C$2.48 billion in 1999, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Santana Technologies priced 31.6 million shares at $18 a share for proceeds of $569 million on March 19 as the richest American IPO so far this year, said John Fitzgibbon of IPOScoop.com.

Visa Inc. priced 406 million shares at $44 each raising $17 billion as the richest IPO in U.S. history in 2008.


Numbers aren't adjusted for inflation so the IPO isn't as large as some of the ones from a few decades ago.

Comments

  1. AnonymousAugust 16, 2010 at 4:51 AM

    <span>
    <p>Earning money online never been this easy and transparent. You would find great tips on how to make that dream amount every month. So go ahead and click here for more details and open floodgates to your online income. All the best.
    </p><p> 

    </p></span>

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>