William Ackman -- The Man Who Stood In Front of the MBIA Train

(source: Portfolio)


I have trouble saying 'MBA' without saying 'MBIA'
— William Ackman


I have the same problem as William Ackman when it comes to MBIA. I get it mixed up with MBA and, unlike Ackman, I also get it mixed up with MBNA. In The Optimist, Jesse Eisinger of Portfolio magazine presents an in-depth profile of William Ackman. For those not familiar, William Ackman is a hedge fund manager whose reputation for activist investing has risen rapidly in the last few years. This article has been making the rounds on the blogs but I thought I would highlight it in a separate post. It is only fitting given how I had mentioned some negative things about him in the past.

Long time readers of this blog may recall how I have been critical of William Ackman over the years. Part of it possibly arises due to opposite bets on the fate of the monoline bond insurers; but most of it is probably because he is not the type of investor that I hold in high regard. I'll bet if we were in the same room, our personalities will conflict. William Ackman is adament and persistent like me. But he is very arrogant, unlike me. I also think he is primarily a good salesperson. This is not to say that he doesn't do his homework but there is a lot of showmanship to his game, and this doesn't sit well with me.

Having said all that, I do think, as I remarked in my Turtle Awards post early this year, we need more people like him. He is an activist investor and he does push companies to make changes. Whether those changes are good or bad is another story, but at least he is doing something.

I also respect his major contrarian bet against the monolines. It was a spectacular call and possibly one of the best contrarian bets in the last 30 years. He basically shorted (through CDS) a AAA-rated company that everyone—regulators, rating agencies, counterparties, customers, investors—thought had a super-strong balance sheet. This was, back then, the equivalent to shorting the highest quality, safest, and dominant player in an industry with practically no visible problem.


I think Carl Icahan's mantle has been passed to William Ackman...but Ackman needs to lay off his super-high-leverage bets, usually using options or swaps. It has completely blown up with Target, and he also has swaps on Borders if I'm not mistaken, which likely will also blow up, if it already hasn't. Ironically, Ackman may have correctly pointed out the flaws of high leverage used by monolines, but he also got burned using leverage with Target, Borders, and other investments. Nevertheless, he posted (roughly) an impressive -12% last year with his main funds.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>