Puget Sound Energy takeover will not be completed this year

Puget Energy says that, assuming that the utilities commission approves it, the takeover will not be completed this year:

Puget Energy also noted that considering the number of business days remaining in 2008, the merger transaction is now not expected to close this year. The merger agreement provides that the parties close 15 business days after all closing conditions have been met, including approval from the Washington Commission.


This is another lesson for risk arbitrageurs to price in delays into deals. This is one of the reasons I tend not to look at annualized returns and try to aim for absolute returns of 15% or more (depending on risk.)

Comments

  1. AnonymousDecember 11, 2008 at 5:25 PM

    disappointed that it isn't closing this year, but likewise, it's one of the reasons why I don't bother with 3-4% spreads.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sivaram VDecember 11, 2008 at 8:25 PM

    Yep... I share similar thoughts...the ones that must get killed with these delays are the professional arbitrageurs. They take positions with less than 5% return and use leverage to boost it. Small investors can just hang in there, as long as the opportunity cost isn't too great...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sivaram VDecember 12, 2008 at 9:54 AM

    Also, just remembered that this may or may not mean much. The share price may trade up if the commission announces their decision. So, we'll see...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>