CFA sponsored speeches by Marc Faber, Jim Grant, Jeremy Grantham

I found some interesting audio speeches from Marc Faber, Jeremy Grantham, and Jim Grant from the archives of the CFA Institute. I only list speakers that I respect and find insightful; you may find other speakers from their archives that you like (for instance, some people seem to like Mohamed El-Erian of PIMCO whereas I am not a fan of him.)

(click on the 'Launch' button near the bottom-right on the linked pages)

Looking Globally for Growth 2008 - Marc Faber (July 24 2008)

Valuation, Risk, and Asset Allocation - Jeremy Grantham (July 22 2008)

What Next? - Jim Grant (Oct 7 2008)

These speeches are macro-oriented and don't really concentrate on specific stock selections. Marc Faber relies on macro views along with some technical investing; Jim Grant is a fixed income specialist, with a heavy bias towards hard currencies; Jeremy Grantham is a value-oriented quantitative macro investor. The speeches are similar to other speeches/interviews given by these individuals so you can skip them if you don't have time. If you have to listen to only one, I would recommend the person you are least familiar with.


It's amazing how much the situation has changed since those speeches. If Jim Grant was starting to worry about the FedRes balance sheet in October, I am sure he is having a heart attack right now (given that the FedRes is considering making open market purchases of US Treasuries and agency bonds), and I don't expect him to survive next year ;)

For what it's worth, I do not agree with the prescription for the crisis from the Austrian Economics followers such as Jim Grant and Marc Faber. These guys overlook the political elements that are part of economics. If we follow the suggestions of Liquidationists, countries will collapse very easily, with possible changes in the political system (if you think fascism or communism is obsolete, think again.) At least, these guys are forthright with their views and have been warning of impending doom for ages (Jim Grant has been warning since the 80's it seems.) In contrast, we have the fake free-marketers that I call the 'WSJ crowd' who push for low taxes, low regulation, and minimal government when they are making money; and free money handed to them when their businesses head downhill. As for Jeremy Grantham, we share similar views.

Comments

  1. AnonymousDecember 2, 2008 at 1:39 AM

    Thanks for the link Sivaram. There are a lot of free webcasts that look good!

    hpm

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousDecember 3, 2008 at 10:37 AM

    You're doing a good job digging these videos out - I just watched part of the Jum Grant / Ben Graham lecture (and saved the rest for later!)

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousDecember 10, 2008 at 5:23 PM

    lot of free webcast for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousDecember 10, 2008 at 5:24 PM

    Thanks for the nice speeches.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>