GE Capital & CIT

One of the big news stories in the last week is the potential bankruptcy of CIT Group. This is a lender which seems to finance small and medium businesses. Rob Cox at BreakingViews thinks that, in the worst case, GE Capital will follow the path of CIT (thanks to Alea for mentioning this story). Unfortunately, BreakingViews doesn't seem to allow one to quote their text so check out that link or get the info somewhere else.

The author mentions some similarities and points out how GE Capital has benefitted from US government support, while the government, for some unexplainable reason, hasn't been as forthcoming with support for CIT. Perhaps its because CIT is much smaller than GE Capital. Similar to GE Capital, CIT was owned by a major industrial company, Tyco, in the past.

I don't know much about CIT or GE Capital but my impression is that GE Capital is more vulnerable to consumer lending (credit card loans) and is more exposed to Eastern Europe than CIT. If non-real-estate debt goes sour (i.e. industrial loans, consumer credit card loans, etc), we will probably see more CIT-type cases. Although I am not expecting problems on the scope of the real estate bust, it is still worth keeping an eye on what happens in this area. Everyone is so concerned about real estate but I think that is looking in the rear-view mirror a bit too much.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>