Sears beats consensus earnings estimates

Sears finally managed to beat consensus estimates, after posting terrible numbers for what seems like 2 years.

Sears Holdings Corp (SHLD.O) forecast quarterly profit above Wall Street estimates on Thursday, sending its shares up nearly 18 percent.

...

The company, controlled by hedge fund manager Edward Lampert, forecast earnings of $2.44 to $3.09 per share for the fourth quarter ending on Jan. 31, down from $3.17 a year earlier.

Analysts on average had expected profit of $1.90 a share for the quarter, according to Reuters Estimates.

For the full year, Sears expects to earn $1.27 to $1.90 per share, compared with analysts' estimates of 53 cents.

The company also said December sales at its stores open at least a year fell 7.3 percent, with Kmart down 1.1 percent and U.S. Sears stores dropping 12.8 percent.


K-mart, which had been a drag is outperforming now that consumers are switching to low cost retailes. Same-store sales fell less than many of its competitors. However, Sears posted terrible numbers of the last 2 years so the comparison is easy for Sears. Also, the company supposedly bought back more shares in the $40ish range.

I think 2009 will be challenging given the deteriorating economy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>