Russian Ruble completely disintegrating

It's not a surprise given the collapse in the commodity markets but one of the hardest hit currencies is the Russian Ruble:



Things are not well in the land of the bear. However, this isn't bad per se. Russia is a country dependent on commodity exports and it will become more competitive as the Ruble collapses. The ones that are hurt are the Russian savers who own Ruble-denominated assets. The question comes down to employment vs wealth. Weakening currencies tend to improve employment prospects while you lose your wealth.

(A lot of other currencies are also weakening, with the British pound weakening over the last year to levels seen in early 2000's. My country, Canada, has a quasi-commodity currency and it weakened late last year but I do not anticipate major moves in either direction.)

Comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 23, 2009 at 12:05 AM

    Does this mean Russia is a cheap vacation right now, or do they sell things to foreigners in dollars/euros?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sivaram VJanuary 23, 2009 at 10:02 AM

    I have no idea but... a declining currency will benefit tourism in the long run. Even if they sell in US$ or Euros, their prices will be cheaper in the future--if not soon then within a few years. Their cost of business will drop (because the Ruble did) so they can technically lower what they charge foreigners and maintain a profit margin.

    The best vacation, theoretically, may be something like Iceland. I haven't kept up with their currency and interest rates lately, but its currency was collapsing a few months ago.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>