Risk Arbitrage of PENN

One analyst today remarked that the PENN takeover is likely to proceed.

Shares of Penn National Gaming Inc. climbed Wednesday as an analyst upgraded the company, saying there is little risk its proposed $6.1 billion buyout would fall through.

Lawrence Klatzkin of Jefferies & Co. noted Penn National's stock was recently trading nearly $17 below the buyout price of $67 per share...

The analyst sees little risk to Fortress and Centerbridge receiving the necessary licensing approvals. He also said in a client note that Deutsche has committed to financing the deal and that the agreement leaves little room for Fortress and Centerbridge to back out.



I have no idea why this stock has dropped so much in the last few weeks. Are the risk arbitrage hedge funds liquidating due to margin calls? Or is there some negative development unfolding in the background?

The potential return on this arbitrage situation is attractive enough for me to consider. We are looking at around 30% raw return (deal is supposed to close 2Q08). The downside, though, is that I am not familiar with Penn National Gaming, or the gambling industry in general. When I took some risk arbitrage positions last year in Tribune and ABN-Amro (mom`s account), I had a good idea of the industry and why (or why not) someone would want to buy the target. With PENN, it`s hard for me to say. I believe that gambling stocks in general are overvalued (mostly due to speculation on huge profits from Macau) but not sure about PENN`s situation. If these stocks are overvalued then a merger failure can result in a huge decline in the stock price.

(Talking about merger arbitrage, BCE is down a lot today. A decline of almost 3% is huge for this megacap Canadian stock).

Comments

  1. AnonymousFebruary 10, 2008 at 2:28 PM

    I use www.madmergers.com as my source of merger data. It is really complete data and saves a bunch of time!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>