Test #3: Fitch Places Ambac on Ratings Watch Negative

Fitch, the last remaining rating agency without an opinion, released their updated rating review. It doesn't look like they are releasing any free excerpts so I'm not sure about the details. All I can go by is what the news sites say:

The AAA rating of Ambac's bond insurance unit was put of Rating Watch Negative by Fitch, which means the agency will downgrade to AA+ in four to six weeks unless the company can boost is excess capital levels before then.

A review by Fitch of Ambac's exposure to CDOs and residential mortgage-backed securities found that the insurer is roughly $1 billion short of the extra capital it needs to keep its AAA rating, the agency explained.


Can't say much without looking at the actual report but it seems like Ambac needs to raise $1 billion. We just need to wait and how Ambac actually raises money.

One piece of new information (at least to me) was the following:

The review included an assessment of a $3 billion commitment by Ambac to fund a pool of other structured finance CDOs as of Sept. 30, Fitch noted.


I'm not sure what that is referring to. If anyone can shed some light, feel free to leave a comment...

Comments

  1. MarilynDecember 23, 2007 at 9:55 AM

    Keep up the good work. Merry Christmas!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sivaram VDecember 23, 2007 at 10:54 AM

    People actually read my blog? ;)

    Thanks for the warm wishes... All the best to you & your family as well... may 2008 be a prosperous one for you...

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousDecember 23, 2007 at 3:29 PM

    I don't know what will happen in the future. Since I am also making a concentrated bet on ABK, I feel that my opinions are biased. Here is my rationale;

    I feel that bankrupcy is a remote possibility. As an investor still building up to my retirement. I don't play remote possibilities. There is always a possibility that the world will come to an end but we don't base our investments that way.

    The next worst scenario is a major capital dilution. I feel that at this time, the market has factored a significant portion of this into the stock. In a very bad situation, I will get significant part of my money back eventually.

    For what it is worth, Marty Whitman was on reccord very recently as saying that they are now going big time into MBI, ABK and radian. You can find the link in the message board of MBI.

    Happy holidays and a prosperous 2008 to you.

    John

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousDecember 24, 2007 at 12:00 AM

    Here is the link

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=613034036&play=1

    John

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sivaram VDecember 24, 2007 at 3:37 PM

    thanks for the link Neanderthal... that's a nice find...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>