Various audio interviews... Martin Whitman, Jean-Marie Eveillard, Marc Faber, etc

Here are some audio interviews with prominent investors. Some of these have been making the trip on the blogging world so you may have encountered them before. I have been listening to these over the weeks and some are worth checking out. Note that these interviews are not all current and were conducted months ago (years ago in the case of the last one mentioned.)

Thanks to Controlled Greed for bringing to my attention the audio interviews at King World News.

King World News has a bunch of interviews with prominent investors and strategists. King World News seems biased towards gold and seems skeptical of mainstream economics so the interview subjects are biased in that direction. You may want to check their archive to find any that may interest you. Here are a few that you may find worthwhile (in no particular order.) I would recommend the ones with an asterisk (I have not listened to John Mauldin's yet but he usually has interesting things to say.)

Jim Rogers (nothing new)

Marc Faber (didn't find anything insightful)

Jim Grant (usual stuff)

*Jean-Marie Eveillard Part I & Part II (I did not know Jean-Marie was a fan of Austrian Economics...unfortunately interview has very little to do with stock picking...he doesn't do too many new interviews so worth checking out)

*John Mauldin Part I (usually interesting... haven't heard it yet)

Eric Sprott (He's the most prominent hedge fund manager in Canada, who is also super-bearish and typically bullish on commodities and gold. His mutual funds blew up last year but his hedge funds did well.)


Financialsense Newshour with Jim Puplava interviewed Martin Whitman regarding his latest book (here is the link to the MP3 file.) Whitman is getting old and it's great to see him still giving interviews. Value investors and distressed investors may want to check out his latest book on distressed investing. As I have said numerous times, it's extremely difficult to follow Martin Whitman's investing style unless you were a specialist or a professional working in the industry. In addition to the time and resources required to gain sufficient knowledge, small investors just don't have access to the debt market (unlike the 1940's and 50's, my impression is that pure distressed investing is mostly done through senior bonds, trade claims, and so forth.)


Finally, an investor by the name of Chris Leithner from Australia gave a speech to the Mises Institute back in 2005 on how Benjamin Graham's value investing may fit with Austrian Economics (here is the MP3 recording.) There is also this paper, Ludwig von Mises, Meet Benjamin Graham: Value Investing from an Austrian Point of View, that Leithner published on the topic. I'm not an economist but for what it's worth, I think Austrian Economics is simplistic and ignores human behaviour. In fact, I think Keynesians are probably better value investors—after all John Maynard Keynes was a pretty good investor and someone by the name of Warren Buffet is too ;)

Comments

  1. Daniel M. RyanAugust 4, 2009 at 2:47 AM

    One man's simplism is another man's rectitude. :)

    One of the reason I like the Austrian School, particularly the von Mises variety, is because of its agnosticism outside of the confines of pure theory. According to von Mises, the only way to forecast or spy out in advance is to use the "understanding." To understand, any method (or collection of methods) can do if it isn't illogical, if it works well enough and if its risks are recognized.

    There's no one better than a Misesian when it comes to shooting down supposed rules that "always" work. They always work until they don't.   

    ReplyDelete
  2. Plan MaestroAugust 4, 2009 at 10:57 AM

    Why Keynes is a better model  for value investing than Mieses

    The problem with Austrian economics is that it is too smart by half. With its plethora of unitended consequences and counterintuitive insights it has a grabbing appeal to brilliant people. It makes them think that they are thinking.

    However, Austrian economics paints with a wide brush and is used in situations where it does not work. Invert, always invert. Have you asked yourself when Austrian economics does not work? the exceptions?

    I think Keynes is a much better model for a value investor:

    Keynes was specific: he explained when his insights worked and when they didn't
    Keynes was pragmatic: he recognized his errors an learned from them
    Keynes was bottom-up: he actually tried to understand how things worked, not how they should work
    Keynes was a great investor: not surprising given the qualities described above

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>