Brookfield properties calls for real estate bottom

They aren't saying it's a bottom but their strategy seems to be pinned on it. Brookfield Properties, one of Canada's largest corporations, is betting big that real estate has hit a bottom. The Globe & Mail reports:

Canada's largest conglomerate is betting the real estate market has hit bottom, and announced plans Tuesday to back its contrarian wager by raising a stunning $4.9-billion to buy homes, office towers and shopping malls around the globe.

Brookfield and real estate subsidiary Brookfield Properties Corp. revealed Tuesday that they have struck a $4-billion, real estate turnaround fund, backed by a dozen major institutional investors. At a time when the sector is cash-strapped, the fund plans to buy properties or take stakes in real estate companies.

Calling a bottom to the real estate market is not for the faint-of-heart. Brookfield is planning to buy at a time when U.S. house prices continue to fall, and mall and office building owners are struggling to keep tenants and collect rent. Other deep-pocketed fund managers are still coping with the hangover from the real estate bust: The Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec took a $4-billion (Canadian) writedown Tuesday on its property holdings.

Brookfield chief executive officer Bruce Flatt acknowledged that he is going against the flow by taking on projects such as a California subdivision full of unfinished, outsized homes that come with massive garages and “whisper sinks” (a trumpeted feature of kitchen sinks made of cast iron, rather than noisy, thin stainless steel).


It's a very gutsy call. Brookfield is very skilled in real estate and has a good track record. Like most distress funds, they are buying real estate for very low prices (one example cited is them buying property for 10% of peak values.)

Even though the purchase prices may seem low, these are still risky assets. Brookfield can easily blow up if we end up like Japan, with continuously declining prices for a decade or more. USA doesn't have the poor demographics of Japan but it does have a whole hoard of other problems. One of the key concerns is whether consumers will even be able to afford the homes. Japanese consumers didn't have debt problems, and indeed were swimming in cash, but the same isn't true for Americans. I suspect many Americans won't have clean balance sheets for as long as 10 years.

Residential real estate affordability will also probably take a hit when the US government curbs the support provided by the GSEs. Right now, the government is willing to absorb losses at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in order to cushion the real estate bust. But they may not be able to do that for very long if their regular budget expenditures remain high (in the trillion+ range.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>