Ambac Rallies 50% On (Likely) Short-covering

Ambac rallied 50% today on what many media claims is collateral disclosure related to their GIC business. Speaking as a shareholder, that press release (i) was nothing anything materially new (prior presentations have provided similar, but not identical, disclosures), and (ii) is actually bearish (the company will be a billion short if it gets downgraded further and recall that William Ackman's bet against FSA is based on a similar scenario.)

My opinion is that the stock rallied on short-covering most likely related to Ambac being given the go-ahead to buy some stock. I have never been a short-seller and not exactly versed in it but today looks like short-covering. Fifty million shares were traded today versus a daily volume of around fourteen million. The monolines are very volatile and we had a case early in the year when Ambac fell around 50% within a few days only to rally 100% in one day. But of course, if you bought at a high price, you will still be down--hence the reason averaging down can be attractive.

I think the stock is going to sell off tomorrow and until we get some positive fundamentals--this basically means clarity regarding mortgage losses--this stock isn't going to go anywhere. The set up of Connie Lee, if it is successful, will help but I wonder how customers are going to insure with Connie Lee.

Here is a funny exchange between two users on Marketwatch.com's news comments about Ambac yesterdady:

Pertinax: Ambac will go down like a redwood.

dryheavesdaily: if i am not mistaken redwoods hardly ever go down and are impervious to fire. Am I wrong?


LOL... Here's hoping Ambac lives as long as a redwood :)

Comments

  1. CrocodilianJuly 11, 2008 at 3:09 AM

    sorry you own this, but "rallies %50" is a headline you'll be able to write many times as this woofer bounces between 1/8 bid and 1/4 asked.

    Its time to say of the credit markets "non credo"; the next time you hear someone say "I want to believe" its going to be Mulder's voiceover for the next X-Files movie.

    The point of an insurer is that you can rely on them, that they are more reliable than what is being insured. What is the purpose of a speculative insurer?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>