Ericsson Clobbered: Down Around 25%

A stock dropping 25% isn't necessarily big news but when it happens to a large-cap with a moderate P/E, it is worth paying attention. In this case, it happens to be Ericsson (ERIC), the largest communications equipment provider in the world.

(source: stockcharts.com)

I don't know much about this company, other than some tidbits when I was looking at companies like Nortel, so I don't know how accurate the numbers in Yahoo Finance are. According to Yahoo Finance, ERIC has a trailing P/E of 11.3 and forward P/E 10.7 (likely to be way off given the recent news), P/Sales of 2.3 and P/Book-Value 3.3, with a a market cap $49.5 billion. Ericsson trades at a lower multiple than most of its competitors, such as Lucent-Alcatel, Nortel, Motorola, and Nokia (not all of these are direct competitors).

All the communications equipment providers are running into headwinds but it's worth watching them. Clearly the capex that some of these technology outfits have been expecting haven't materialized. It remains to be seen if businesses will cut technology capital expenditures further as the economy slows. There is a theory on Wall Street that tech, communications, and related areas, will be spared the brunt of any slowdown due to solid capex by businesses. I'll do more homework on Ericsson in the future...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>