Good website of announced M&A

I found a good website listing all the announced M&A from a posting by the user, MergerArb, on the WSJ blog. Obviously one needs to double-check the numbers that are posted and dig into the details to see the risk but it's a good site. You can find the M&A merger arbitrage site here.

According to the numbers from that site, the top 10 potential profits as of today would be one of the following (note: these are not annualized profits):

RDN....78.4%
LEND...69.7%
TONE...44.8%
TRB....28.3%
LEV....27.1%
OATS...26.2%
SLM....24.5%
CMLS...21.6%
PHH....21.4%
XMSR...20.1%

Note that the list doesn't seem to include announced foreign deals (such as the BCE or ABN-Amro deal) and the risk in these are very high. The risk in the BCE and ABM-Amro deal are likely low IMO but the ones above are very high (I can see many of them not going through).

Comments

  1. AnonymousAugust 12, 2007 at 1:37 AM

    That site's a joke. Fails to offer anything that isn't already publicly available. No research. No analysis.

    Try this for M&A information that you can actually use: maresearch.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sivaram VAugust 12, 2007 at 8:30 PM

    Thanks for the info. I don't know anything about the services you provide but if anyone is interested, I hope they check out your site.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousAugust 13, 2007 at 10:31 PM

    That maresearch.com website doesn't offer any timely information at all for free, so I don't know what the other poster is complaining about. Unless the owner of that site has access to insider information, he is just regurgitating publicly available information, and charging a lot of money to read it. This guy must be associated with the site somehow, and feels the need to go around and bash his competitors.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sivaram VAugust 14, 2007 at 1:35 PM

    Yeah that site isn't free but I have no problem with people offering paid services. I haven't seen any reports from that site but if he/she digs into the deals and gives solid info, it may be worth it to those that can afford it.

    The free site I linked in my site has misleading info. It seems to be correct at time of publication but not in real-time. For example, a lot of the deals with high potential return percentages are stock swap deals and the stocks of the buyer have fallen a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousFebruary 6, 2008 at 9:03 PM

    If you are someone looking for merger data, you should also check out www.madmergers.com. Instead of trading the high risk (high return) mergers, I prefer to trade the lower risk spreads. I used to trade the higher risk spreads and instead of trading them back and forth (scalping), I found myself holding them thinking that anyday this merger will go through. Some did go through but took a lot longer than planned and some blew up leaving me with a large loss. If you have a loss of 33%, you need to gain 50% after that to get your portfolio back to even. In this environment, I would recommend staying away from the higher risk mergers and focus your attention on the lower risk ones. If you are trading cash mergers, make sure to trade the ones that are not borrowing money and using cash from their balance sheet. The stock mergers are my favorite to trade but takes more advanced software to trade them easily.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousFebruary 10, 2008 at 3:02 PM

    I also like www.madmergers.com! I love the way it's set up, and it makes finding data really easy!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>