Purchase (Special Situation): Ingram Micro
I'm continuing to expand into more risk arbitrage positions. This time, Ingram Micro (NYSE: IM). Unfortunately, all are Chinese deals and there is somewhat increased risk of some event derailing all of them at once so hopefully I find something completely unrelated soon.
Ingram Micro (IM) is a reseller/distributor of information technology products, with a few additional services. It is being bought out by Tianjin Tianhai, a Shangahi Exchange publicly-traded Chinese subsidiary (shipping/logistics) of the large HNA conglomerate (aviation/tourism/logistics). It makes sense from a strategic point of view since the logistics business can be utilized by the Ingram Micro IT distributor business.
Ingram Micro is not that good of a business so it isn't one that I would be pleased to hold if the deal fails (in contrast, recall that Syngenta is one that is a good one). However, the valuation for Ingram Micro is not that high so the stock likely won't fall too far if deal fails.
With my assumptions, the expected return is around 6.5% (you are looking at a raw return of around 8% if deal closes). If the deal closes within a few months, the return is pretty good. But if it drags on, then the return is just ok.
Anyway, here is my analysis of this deal...
Takeover price: $38.90
Deal closing: 2nd half 2016
Purchase price: $35.87
Prob (success) = 95%
Return (success) = 8%
Prob (failure) = 5%
Return (failure) = -30% (assume it drops to $25, about 10% below pre-takeover price)
Expected Return = 6.5%
Initially, the deal was not going to be submitted to CFIUS (later, after some CFIUS consultations, they decided to submit an application) and this leads me to believe that the bidder and Ingram Micro management initially felt there was little national security or sensitive products/services involved. Their assessment is probably correct and gives an indication of how confident they were with regulatory issues.
Ingram Micro (IM) is a reseller/distributor of information technology products, with a few additional services. It is being bought out by Tianjin Tianhai, a Shangahi Exchange publicly-traded Chinese subsidiary (shipping/logistics) of the large HNA conglomerate (aviation/tourism/logistics). It makes sense from a strategic point of view since the logistics business can be utilized by the Ingram Micro IT distributor business.
Ingram Micro is not that good of a business so it isn't one that I would be pleased to hold if the deal fails (in contrast, recall that Syngenta is one that is a good one). However, the valuation for Ingram Micro is not that high so the stock likely won't fall too far if deal fails.
With my assumptions, the expected return is around 6.5% (you are looking at a raw return of around 8% if deal closes). If the deal closes within a few months, the return is pretty good. But if it drags on, then the return is just ok.
Anyway, here is my analysis of this deal...
Takeover price: $38.90
Deal closing: 2nd half 2016
Purchase price: $35.87
Prob (success) = 95%
Return (success) = 8%
Prob (failure) = 5%
Return (failure) = -30% (assume it drops to $25, about 10% below pre-takeover price)
Expected Return = 6.5%
Buffett's Four Key Questions
(1) How likely is it that the promised event will indeed occur?
I think the chance is very high and think it is about 95% of success. Shareholders have approved deal. Financing does not appear to be a risk with the Chinese firm already working to line up funding (the parent company is also very large and can likely source funds if necessary). Risk lies with CFIUS, which is the American government agency that evaluates foreign takeover where national security is a concern. This entity is politically motivated and it is impossible to be certain of any outcome (their decisions are generally not consistent). However, based on public analyst comments and my understanding of Ingram Micro's business, they don't really deal with any sensitive items and don't really have much intellectual property or proprietary products/services (Ingram Micro is essentially a reseller/distributor of IT products). The small amount of business involving the US government, and it does sell some security products, have several competitors that will offer the same products/services.Initially, the deal was not going to be submitted to CFIUS (later, after some CFIUS consultations, they decided to submit an application) and this leads me to believe that the bidder and Ingram Micro management initially felt there was little national security or sensitive products/services involved. Their assessment is probably correct and gives an indication of how confident they were with regulatory issues.
Comments
Post a Comment