Wow... David Sokol resigns from Berkshire Hathaway

A very surprising move:

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. said late Wednesday that David Sokol resigned after it came to light that he bought millions of dollars in Lubrizol Corp. shares shortly before urging Chairman Warren Buffett to buy the company.


Sokol was considered a possible successor to Berkshire Chairman Warren Buffett. Sokol is chairman of several Berkshire Hathaway subsidiaries.

Buffett said that he was surprised by Sokol’s decision and stressed in a statement that he and Sokol don’t consider the Lubrizol trades “unlawful.” Buffett said that Sokol told him that the trades were not a factor in his decision to resign.

“It is my goal to utilize the time remaining in my career to invest my family’s resources in such a way as to create enduring equity value,” Sokol wrote in his letter of resignation, according to the statement.

Sokol had talked about resigning twice before, most recently about two years ago, according to the statement.


Here is a letter by Warren Buffett on the matter.


The media focus will be on the insider transaction but that seems to have nothing to do with the resignation. It looks like David Sokol was thinking about this for a while. This is definitely a blow for Berkshire Hathaway, although the CEO position isn't as critical as the CIO role.

I didn't know Sokol wanted out and indicated he wanted to leave two years ago. A lot of Berkshire Hathaway shareholders and followers probably didn't know that either. David Sokol tackled a very hard problem at NetJets and I wonder if that drained everything from him.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>