2010... The Year It Was

History books would record the year of two thousand and ten as...

Comments

  1. Parker BohnJanuary 13, 2011 at 6:13 PM

    2010... the year the Fed decided to create asset bubbles on purpose, instead of by accident.

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bernanke-qe2-has-helded-improve-the-stock-market-2011-01-13?dist=countdown

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sivaram VelauthapillaiJanuary 15, 2011 at 1:20 AM

    Honestly, I don't really know how much the $600 billion purchase helped. Stocks were doing well even before the purchase program started.

    Interestingly, so far, gold is being sold off...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Parker BohnJanuary 21, 2011 at 10:55 AM

    You may be right about the $600 billion, but I don't appreciate Bernanke trying! :'(

    I do feel like we're in for an extended period of meager investment returns, in large part thanks to super-low interest rates.  Look how its affected the two of us.  I've accepted the poor returns, and I am trying to generate alpha through stock-picking (I'd be thrilled to know I could get 10% a year for the next 10 years).  You've been squeezed out of the market almost entirely, due to poor valuations.

    If valuations were similar to when our parents were this age, you'd be fully invested, and we both could get great returns by buying just about anything (stocks, bonds, real estate).

    Basically, the previous generation had the ability to transfer wealth to their future selves in a highly effective manner.  We don't have that ability at all.

    Buffett has some interesting things to say about rates and returns in this 1999 article:
    http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/11/22/269071/index.htm

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sivaram VelauthapillaiJanuary 28, 2011 at 11:20 PM

    Yep, that's a great article. I read it before but it's one of Buffett's best. The interesting thing to me is how we have had two major stock market crashes in a decade (2000-2003; 2007-2009) and yet the market never really got cheap.

    We'll see what happens. Did you check out Jeremy Grantham's latest? He has a nice section on bubbles.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>