Investing in India through some Japanese companies

I ran across a MarketWatch article that highlighted two Japanese companies that are set to profit if India does well. I'm always wary of these indirect strategies suggested by analysts but it's something to consider if one is looking to invest in India without paying the historical premium for US-listed Indian stocks:


Investors looking for an easy way to invest in India's fast-growing market can get it via the shares of select companies in the developed market of Japan, analysts say.


"For the last decade, India has been associated, in the minds of Japanese investors, with motorcycles and small cars," said Macquarie Securities analysts Shih-Han Huang and Peter Eadon-Clarke in a recent report. "The last 18 months, however, have seen major strategic acquisitions in the pharmaceuticals, telecom and steel sectors."

Their two principal India-related Japanese recommendations are pharmaceutical giant Daiichi-Sankyo Co. (TSE: 4568; OTC: DSKYF) because of the strategic benefits from its acquisition of a majority stake in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. (OTC: RBXLF); and steel maker JFE Holdings Inc. (TSE:5411; OTC: JFEEF) because of the benefits of the overseas expansion business plan through its strategic alliance with JSW Steel Ltd.

Macquarie rates both Japanese companies as outperform.

"The strategic attractions of Ranbaxy to Daiichi-Sankyo relates to Ranbaxy's distribution network throughout emerging markets," they said.

Ranbaxy is a giant in its own right -- it has a presence in 125 countries, ground operations in 49 of them, and manufacturing operations in nine nations, the analysts said.

They said that in the third quarter of last year, Europe and North American sales accounted for 36% of Ranbaxy's total, with India and other developing countries making up the rest.


...


JFE Holdings unit JFE Steel Corp. acquired about a 10% stake in JSW Steel -- India's third-largest steelmaker -- in November 2009, and said it will also license its automotive steel technology.

Toyota Motor Corp. and Nissan Motor Co. plan to build factories in India in 2010, which will spur demand for high-grade steel. JFE's move to tie with JSW could give it a head start on domestic rivals in supplying steel to the fast-growing market, Nikkei reported recently.


Pharama is outside my circle of competence—I have little interest in following that industry—and I'm kind of bearish on steel so I have low interest in any of these mentioned companies. Nevertheless, it is worth checking these out, especially given how Japanese stocks, in general, appear cheap. If one can grab cheap stocks with hidden emerging market potential, it'll likely be profitable in the long run. I'm not sure if these two Japanese companies are cheap so one needs to analyze them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Charlie Munger: Stock market as a pari-mutuel betting system

The model I like to sort of simplify the notion of what goes o­n in a market for common stocks is the pari-mutuel system at the racetrack. If you stop to think about it, a pari-mutuel system is a market . Everybody goes there and bets and the odds change based o­n what's bet. That's what happens in the stock market. —Charlie Munger, "Art of Stock Picking" Although I don't share the same views on politics, I am probably closer to Charlie Munger than Warren Buffett when it comes to how we view the world. Warren Buffett is almost singly focused on business and investing, and is not very opinionated, indeed possibly not knowledgeable, in other areas. In contrast, I am closer to Charlie Munger in the sense that I have diverse interests—you can probably tell by the articles I link to or write about—and have an opinion on almost anything. There is one big difference though: I am not into the field of psychology quite like Munger. So it may be surprising to see me rarely
✖ READ MORE >>>