Bears partying like it's New Year's



If you are a bear, you are partying like it's New Year's. If you are a bull or a pig, well...

Ugly day across the board, with almost everything down today...



Multitude of bad news all day with possibly the $30 billion bailout of AIG being the most negative story. Earlier HSBC had also indicated a massive 16 billion (pounds) capital offering (largest in British history). Most of the news was expected but I don't think anyone realizes how bad the sitution is until it occurs.

The US government keeps saying they don't want to nationalize AIG but I think they have to nationalize it and break up the company soon. The government has been pumping tens of billions into AIG due to a so-called systematic risk. Most speculate that investments banks such such as Goldman Sachs will collapse if AIG defaulted on its CDS swaps.

I haven't looked at AIG but it's not clear to me if AIG's problems are due to poor underwriting or if it's due to collateral posting requirements. What AIG was doing is very similar to what Ambac and MBIA were insuring. However, AIG has to post collateral upon rating downgrade and I'm not sure if this is what is causing the losses. If it's simply collateral posting then the government may not lose as much money.

I think Obama is risking political capital with his plan of continuously dumping billions into AIG without any penalty to shareholders, bondholders, or even the board of directors. If I'm not mistaken, the board is still largely the same as the one that approved AIG's foray into the risky bond insurance (although I think it changed somewhat after Greenberg left.) I'm not sure how Obama is going to justify to his citizens spending tens of billions on AIG and not spending a tenth of that on industrial companies.

From a political point of view, a collapsing stock market and a deteriorating economy makes it easier for the Obama administration to do something radical. If the stock market declines another 10% to 20% over the next 6 months, the government can nationalize banks and penalize bondholders. The shock to the market will be more tolerable by then.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>