Dumped IntenseDebate and going with JS-Kit

I switched the commenting system to JS-Kit and hopefully I won't run into the problems I had with IntenseDebate :( IntenseDebate is nice and has a smooth interface but it has some serious flaws. One big flaw was the slow response time in loading comments and the widget. One user commented that it wasn't working in the Opera browser and another commented that response time when typing messages was really long. The main reason I dumped it though is due to its limitation in the comment length. It was really annoying, especially since we tend to have few but really long comments on this blog, to break up the comment into multiple ones. The free version of JS-Kit also seems to limit comments but it is much larger.

I looked at the DISQUS comment system but decided to go with JS-Kit. JS-Kit offers integration with more logon systems (including Open ID) so that's a big plus IMO. It also syncs comments back to Blogger so comments will always be avaiable even if one removes JS-Kit. We'll see how well JS-Kit performs. The downsides to JS-Kit are its weak, somewhat simplistic, widgets and GUI. It's customizable but one needs to spend some time on it.


Unfortunately, because IntenseDebate hosts the comments on their site, whatever that was posted in the last week is missing. Unless I can figure out a simple way to import the comments back into Blogger, we have lost those comments (I may post some of them manually).

Comments

  1. AnonymousFebruary 21, 2009 at 10:51 PM

    One huge limitation I found with blogger and 3rd party comment systems was that if you ever intend to get your own host, you cannot retrieve the comments. You lose it all.
    s
    Just a thought in case you ever decide to host your own blog.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 21, 2009 at 11:03 PM

    The blog hosting systems are improving, even if it's a slow advance. Hopefully we'll get upgrades that fixes the limitation you cited, as well as other features that are sorely lacking right now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousFebruary 22, 2009 at 5:49 AM

    Thanks so much for choosing JS-Kit :)
    s
    Please don't hesitate to drop us a line at support@js-kit.com if you ever have any concerns or ideas - we're here to help!
    s
    Cheers,
    s
    Chris

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousFebruary 22, 2009 at 3:51 PM

    Thanks for offering your help Chris. It's still early but so far JS-Kit has been functioning well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Preinstalled Scripts HostingApril 22, 2009 at 8:51 AM

    I have been using Intense Debate for about a week now and I love it.  I've had no problems with it and I love the fact that if someone comments on my blog on Friendfeed it sends that comment to the post itself.
     
    <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:1627421319 -2147483648 8 0 66047 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> <!--[if gte mso 10]>
    <style>
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-ansi-language:#0400;
    mso-fareast-language:#0400;
    mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
    </style>
    <![endif]-->
    <p><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Tahoma; color: black;">http://www.marblehost.com/free-scripts.php </span>

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Charlie Munger: Stock market as a pari-mutuel betting system

The model I like to sort of simplify the notion of what goes o­n in a market for common stocks is the pari-mutuel system at the racetrack. If you stop to think about it, a pari-mutuel system is a market . Everybody goes there and bets and the odds change based o­n what's bet. That's what happens in the stock market. —Charlie Munger, "Art of Stock Picking" Although I don't share the same views on politics, I am probably closer to Charlie Munger than Warren Buffett when it comes to how we view the world. Warren Buffett is almost singly focused on business and investing, and is not very opinionated, indeed possibly not knowledgeable, in other areas. In contrast, I am closer to Charlie Munger in the sense that I have diverse interests—you can probably tell by the articles I link to or write about—and have an opinion on almost anything. There is one big difference though: I am not into the field of psychology quite like Munger. So it may be surprising to see me rarely
✖ READ MORE >>>