Time For a Superbear: Marc Faber

I guess it's not surprising that Bloomberg is giving some airtime to a superbear like Marc Faber. Check out his video interview here (click link on top-right of window). Nothing really new from him (especially given that I linked to an interview just 2 weeks ago I believe) except for his view that the market may rally between October to spring due to seasonal factors.

My quick summary of his comments are below:



  • Ever the extremist, thinks that the bankruptcy of Lehman may be good for the economy... nothing new for Marc Faber followers but he is an extremist who doesn't like the financial industry. He thinks that they have grown too big relative to the so-called real economy and it's good to see it shrink.
  • Sees potential for a rally between middle of October to spring of next year. This is the time of the year market typically bottoms and is seasonally strong between October and early spring... but thinks new all-time highs are out of the question
  • Thinks Lehman's problems are a symptom of excessive credit growth... not a big fan of Greenspan or Bernanke
  • AIG may be a bigger problem than Lehman
  • Thinks the world will be in a recession in an year (2009)... as he has repeatedly before, earnings estimates will come down and this means S&P 500 is not as cheap as it seems
  • Thinks problems started with the FedRes in the early 80's and last decade, not regulating derivatives, among other things. This is totally hypocritical of him to say because I have never seen him endorse regulation. I'll bet if the FedRes regulated the markets more, he would criticize them for intervening in the free market. This sounds so much like the laissez-faire free-market proponents, like Alan Greenspan, who stood aside not regulating anything and now are starting to suggest greater regulation is needed.


As usual, Marc Faber is often wrong on some issues. However, he is one of the most influential investors for me because he is the ultimate contrarian and states his strong opinions and positions...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>