Ambac Kicked Out of S&P 500

Ambac is on the verge of getting kicked out of one index, Fortune 100, after becoming the smallest company in the Fortune 100 early this year. The Fortune 100 is based on revenue and Ambac had the lowest revenue at minus $4.18 billion last year (supposedly). Well, it lost its place among another prestigious index, the S&P 500. Ambac is slated to be removed from the index in a week.

Tobacco products producer Lorillard Inc. will replace Ambac Financial Group Inc. in the S&P 500 after the close of trading June 10, Standard & Poor's said Tuesday.

Ambac's market capitalization is about $860 million, ranking it 500 in the benchmark index, S&P said. The value of the bond insurer has plummeted during the past year over its exposure to mortgage debt. Its stock, which traded at $89.94 in May 2007, closed Tuesday down 2 cents at $3.


There will be some short-term selling pressure on the stock as passive indexers sell Ambac and buy Lorillard. However, Ambac will likely end up near the top of the pack in the S&P 400. It is also likely that Ambac will fall out of the radar of most of Wall Street given that many analysts cover the smaller companies to a lesser degree (it's not exactly small but more like mid-cap but still). Ambac had been part of the S&P 500 since 2000.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>