Purchase: Jaclyn (JLN)

I purchased Jaclyn (JLN) as an arbitrage play. I evaluated the company in a post recently. The stock has been selling off over the last few days and I hope it isn't due to some bad news on the horizon. Some investors may be selling now that the stock is going to be demoted from AMEX to PinkSheets OTC but it's not clear. Since there are no arbitrage funds involved in this (only ownes with less than 250 shares get a cash offer) the price likely provides no signal regarding the buyout of minority owners.

Purchase Price: $7.80
Time Horizon: Short-term (special situation)

Comments

  1. AnonymousMay 6, 2008 at 10:22 PM

    Well thought-out analysis of JLN. I purchased my shares a month ago for $7.60. I have done a lot of arbitrage plays over the last 2 years and have done pretty well. I have a blog mostly dedicated to arbitrage investing at www.ryanhegs.com. Hopefully you will find it interesting and useful. I plan to continue visiting your blog to get your insight on situations.
    Thanks!
    RyanHegs

    ReplyDelete
  2. craigatkMay 6, 2008 at 11:02 PM

    I stumbled across the original post on circle of competence a day before I saw your post. Great to see others backing up the analysis. Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sivaram VMay 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM

    Thanks for the comments...

    To Ryan (or others who have done a lot of M&A arbirage):

    One of the things I've been reading, and I commented on this a while before , is the risk that arbitrage works until it doesn't. That is, over the last few years, most deals have closed successfully and it was hard not to lose money. But are we in a new phase when more diligence is required on our part? Just something crossing my mind these days...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt...
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>