First Quarter Bond Insurance Plummets

Reuters, quoting Thompson Financial data, provides some detail on first quarter bond insurance use.

Issuance of insured U.S. municipal bonds shrank by about half in the first quarter of the year as the subprime mortgage crisis eroded investor confidence in many guarantors, Thomson Financial said on Tuesday.


Bulls like me believe that some of the shrinkage is temporary, while some is permanent. There is clearly a reluctance by some state governments in using insurance. My guess is that they will avoid insurance for the next 6 months to an year, but will return next year.


FSA more than doubled its market share in the first quarter, to 52.7 percent, even as the overall issuance of insured debt fell to $21.7 billion from $55.1 billion a year ago, Thomson said.

The bond insurance unit of Ambac Financial Group, which held the top spot in the first quarter of last year, saw its market share shrink to 1 percent in January-March from 24.7 percent a year ago, according to Thomson.

MBIA's share shrank to 2.1 percent from 19.4 percent a year ago.

Financial Guaranty Insurance Co, which went from being one of the top-rated insurers to a junk credit in the span of a few months, did not insure any new muni deals, Thomson said. FGIC ranked fourth in insurance market share in the first quarter last year.

Assured Guaranty climbed to the second spot, boosting its market share to 25.9 percent from just 1 percent a year ago.


Not surprisingly, Ambac saw its market share plummet from around 25% to 1%, while MBIA slumped to 2% from 19%.

Some Berkshire bulls, not to mention the monoline shorts, have been saying that Berkshire Hathaway Assurance (BHAC) will slay the existing monolines. So far no sign of Berkshire doing anything. If anything, most of the monolines have faced problems of their own making more so than any attacks from BHAC.

Assuming these market share numbers are reasonably accurate, Berkshire couldn't even manage to dislodge the untarnished, smaller, monolines like Assured Guaranty. It should be noted that Berkshire has been involved in insuring existing deals (to provide multiple insurance for those who need the underlying bonds to maintain high ratings) and this won't be captured in this new issuance market share information.

Comments

  1. moneythoughtsApril 1, 2008 at 5:17 PM

    Hi,

    I was just checking out people interested in investing and came across your blog. I was a portfolio manager of municipal bonds when MBIA came about.

    I write and paint. Take a look at my blog, I think you might find it of interest.

    Fred

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sivaram VApril 2, 2008 at 9:41 PM

    I checked your site... one suggestion is to perhaps use labels for different topics. Since you have a blog with diverse elements, I think labels may help...

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJuly 1, 2008 at 4:24 AM

    Insurance bonds are required for a variety of things, Bruce. Life insurance is indeed one instance when a bond may be desireable.

    You need to speak to a profressional to better understand the market.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>