Analysis of Ambac by jckhoury at gurufocus.com

A poster by the name of jckhoury at gurufocus.com has posted an investment review of Ambac (ABK). He/she provides an overview of the situation and comes up with some estimates of the intrinsic value of Ambac. The author's optimistic scenario results in a price of $83.74, while the pessimistic case ends up being $15.75. Note that the pessimistic case results in a price below the current stock price. If you are thinking of Ambac or one of its competitors like MBIA, it's worth reading as many opinions as you can so do check out the article.

In my opinion, the real issue with Ambac is pinning its risk to some dollar figure. The valuation seems pretty attractive under most scenarios but the risk of some serious adverse result is highly uncertain. Any success or failure with Ambac will come from correct determination of its risk.

Comments

  1. AnonymousNovember 12, 2007 at 11:41 PM

    One rating agency downgrade and the intrinsic value goes to zero. Rather than analyze ABK the stock, perhaps one should analyze what's going on in Moody's or S&P's analysts' brain cells and motivations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sivaram VNovember 13, 2007 at 10:56 AM

    Thanks for touching on an important issue Michael. I agree with the thrust of your thought in saying that rating cut is extremely crucial.

    I don't think the value drops to zero if rating gets cut from, say, AAA to AA. It will be a disaster but it still isn't zero.

    Furthermore, a rating cut for the large monolines (Ambac and MBIA) is a very low probability because the rating agencies will give time for the monolines to raise capital. This won't be good for shareholders (it will result in heavy dilution) but it will result in the rating being maintained.

    Overall, I agree with you that one needs to consider what the rating agencies are planning to do. I covered a news article in one of my prior posts which said Fitch was reviewing the capital adequacy of these firms. They said they will release their opinion in a few months (I'm reading that as December or early January).

    I still think one needs to peg a value to the company. That's what value investors (including contrarians like me who pretend to be one ;) ) do and without it you don't know the margin of safety.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Hugh Hendry discussion at the Alternative Investment Conference

Thanks to Value Investing World for bringing this Hugh Hendry interview to my attention. I may not agree with all the things—short-term orientation of hedge funds is actually worse IMO; the sharp pencil effect doesn't always work—but Hendry is a true contrarian and worth listening. Like Marc Faber or Jim Rogers, you also can't take everything Hugh Hendry says seriously. I had always felt Hugh Hendry was firmly in the deflation camp but I get the feeling that he is now opening up to high-inflation possibilities. Otherwise, his stance appears to be similar to past opinions.
✖ READ MORE >>>