Time For a Superbear: Marc Faber

I guess it's not surprising that Bloomberg is giving some airtime to a superbear like Marc Faber. Check out his video interview here (click link on top-right of window). Nothing really new from him (especially given that I linked to an interview just 2 weeks ago I believe) except for his view that the market may rally between October to spring due to seasonal factors.

My quick summary of his comments are below:



  • Ever the extremist, thinks that the bankruptcy of Lehman may be good for the economy... nothing new for Marc Faber followers but he is an extremist who doesn't like the financial industry. He thinks that they have grown too big relative to the so-called real economy and it's good to see it shrink.
  • Sees potential for a rally between middle of October to spring of next year. This is the time of the year market typically bottoms and is seasonally strong between October and early spring... but thinks new all-time highs are out of the question
  • Thinks Lehman's problems are a symptom of excessive credit growth... not a big fan of Greenspan or Bernanke
  • AIG may be a bigger problem than Lehman
  • Thinks the world will be in a recession in an year (2009)... as he has repeatedly before, earnings estimates will come down and this means S&P 500 is not as cheap as it seems
  • Thinks problems started with the FedRes in the early 80's and last decade, not regulating derivatives, among other things. This is totally hypocritical of him to say because I have never seen him endorse regulation. I'll bet if the FedRes regulated the markets more, he would criticize them for intervening in the free market. This sounds so much like the laissez-faire free-market proponents, like Alan Greenspan, who stood aside not regulating anything and now are starting to suggest greater regulation is needed.


As usual, Marc Faber is often wrong on some issues. However, he is one of the most influential investors for me because he is the ultimate contrarian and states his strong opinions and positions...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Thoughts on the stock market - March 2020

Image
Right now, DJIA has a P/E of 16.8 and forwand P/E of 15.1, whereas S&P 500 is at 20.1 with forward P/E of 15.8. Source: WSJ market Data If you ignore interest rates and inflation expectations--both of these influence valuations but depends on your macro call-- the market is not cheap. Long-term P/E is around 15. Trailing P/E is around 20% (Dow) to 40% (S&P500) higher than average. Forward P/E is in line with long term average but that assumes a strong V recovery. Consensus forecast is for profits to drop 1.2% in 2020. In 2008, it dropped 25.4% so current forecast is a very mild recession. Covid-19 coronavirus is not going to last more than a few months but these forecasts are still too rosy in my opinion. So I wouldn't rely on forward P/E. The richly valued (mostly tech or high quality) have not fallen much but the distressed ones have. So if you want to outperform in the long run, I think one’s choice right now is to: • Wait for market to fall another, say
✖ READ MORE >>>

Warren Buffett's Evolution and his Three Investment Styles

Image
A Young Warren Buffett In a comment to one of my posts , Mark Carter, who incidentally appears to have a  good blog worth checking out , asked: "Buffett Prime is 1970's to early 1990's" Could you elaborate? I have vaguely indicated how I view Warren Buffett in the past, but I thought I would detail my view of his investing behaviour. This is more of an opinion piece and many others would disagree with me (if you do, I'm curious to hear your thoughts). I don't follow Warren Buffett as closely as many value investors so I may get some facts wrong. My view is that Warren Buffett went through three different phases, with each consisting of different investment techniques. The overall investment theory remained the same—what people call value investing—but his execution, tactics, and strategy differs across the three phases. Some people may break up his career into additional periods but my feeling is that the three I will describe essentially capt
✖ READ MORE >>>

Charlie Munger: Stock market as a pari-mutuel betting system

The model I like to sort of simplify the notion of what goes o­n in a market for common stocks is the pari-mutuel system at the racetrack. If you stop to think about it, a pari-mutuel system is a market . Everybody goes there and bets and the odds change based o­n what's bet. That's what happens in the stock market. —Charlie Munger, "Art of Stock Picking" Although I don't share the same views on politics, I am probably closer to Charlie Munger than Warren Buffett when it comes to how we view the world. Warren Buffett is almost singly focused on business and investing, and is not very opinionated, indeed possibly not knowledgeable, in other areas. In contrast, I am closer to Charlie Munger in the sense that I have diverse interests—you can probably tell by the articles I link to or write about—and have an opinion on almost anything. There is one big difference though: I am not into the field of psychology quite like Munger. So it may be surprising to see me rarely
✖ READ MORE >>>